We welcome proposals that discuss ideas for the future. This can include but is not limited to:
How data professionals are adapting and evolving towards more inclusive data practices.
How innovation is influencing research data services.
New projects, service areas, or ideas for research data.
How data projects, services or research are being reshaped at higher education, industry, government and other research data stakeholders.
Envisioning the future of research data post-pandemic.
Presenters are invited to think about how they are reshaping existing research data practices, systems, services, and technologies as we move towards a more inclusive and thoughtful future. Preference will be given to proposals that critically engage research data systems, technologies, and practices that are traditionally considered neutral. The committee challenges presenters to think about these research data issues in the context of systems of oppression and exclusion (including but not limited to racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia, and classism), labor and hierarchies, and capitalism and profit models.
We welcome proposals from both first-time RDAP presenters and those who provide a follow up on a project previously presented at RDAP.
We also welcome submissions from employees of sponsors and will evaluate them using the same methods as other submissions. However, submissions will not be considered if they focus only on demonstrating or selling a sponsor’s specific product.
Presentation, 15 minutes
The talk should be on original research, a project, or present a perspective. Each talk will have one presenter (the primary presenter, unless other presenters are listed. Max three presenters). The RDAP Summit organizers will group the talk with others around a similar theme.
Lightning talk (pre-recorded with live Q&A), 5 minutes
The lightning talk can be on any subject and can focus on a perspective, a work-in-progress, or a completed project. Each talk will have one presenter (primary presenter unless other arrangements are made). Lightning talks will be pre-recorded, with a live Q&A during the Summit.
Propose a poster that would be presented virtually. Poster presenters will have the opportunity to chat one-on-one with RDAP Summit attendees through the conference platform.
Discussion Panel, 45min
Propose a moderated 3-4 person panel that will engage in a live conversation with each other and with the RDAP Summit attendees on a topic. Proposal must include a moderator and three example questions that may be discussed.
Workshop, 3 hours or less (including a short break)
The workshop should be interactive, educational, and noncommercial. Education and Resources committee members are available to help facilitate a virtual, hands-on workshop if needed.
The committee will consider 1) the currency and relevance of the topic to the field, 2) appropriateness of the proposal for the session type, 3) impact of practices, conclusions, or recommendations (if applicable), 4) evidence of critical engagement & ethical research (if applicable), 5) organization and clarity. Workshop proposals will also be evaluated based on their learning outcomes. Lightning talks can be shorter and more informal and the committee will evaluate them with that in mind.
All submissions will be masked with the author(s) name(s) and institutional affiliation(s) removed prior to review. To allow for anonymous masked review, author names, institutional affiliations, and address information must be absent in the summary section of the submission form. The Conference Planning Chairs reserve the right to edit summaries containing any author, institutional, location, or company names for the purpose of eliminating identifying information before sending the summary to reviewers. You are urged to anonymize your summary yourself, because the Conference Planning Chairs cannot guarantee the resulting quality if changes must be made after submission. One simple way of anonymizing the summary is replacing any identifying information such as institutional affiliation with the generic descriptor in brackets. For example, instead of Data University, use [institution] or [university].
Finally, we expect:
Please view the full rubric used to evaluate the proposals for detailed evaluation criteria.
RDAP and the Journal of eScience Librarianship (JeSLIB) are pleased to continue their partnership for RDAP Summit 2022.
All RDAP Summit 2022 presenters are encouraged to submit proposals for a special issue in JeSLIB. Commentaries are also welcome for publication in JeSLIB from first time and veteran attendees.
JeSLIB is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes full-length papers, eScience in Action articles, reviews, commentaries, and video articles. For more information see JeSLIB’s Guidelines for Authors.
Submissions require the contact information of all presenters, the proposal type, the title, summary (max 300 words), a brief statement about what informed your involvement in this topic, and three or fewer keywords describing the proposal. Workshop proposals will require learning outcomes. Panel proposals will require three example questions that may be discussed.Submit Proposal
RDAP Summit is an independent conference through the RDAP Association, which provides accessible and affordable opportunities to connect with the research data support community.Presenters will receive complimentary conference registration.
Send your questions to the RDAP Conference Chairs: firstname.lastname@example.org